$10 is a nice round number—but it’s a lot more than that. As the millions of individual supporters of the fight against malaria know, it’s also the power to protect a child, give peace of mind to a parent and keep a family together.
Malaria No More was mentioned in an article in this week’s The Economist, which discussed investments in Africa made by the Acumen Fund, including in mosquito nets. Here’s an excerpt:
The notion of applying business methods to philanthropy is attractive, but does it really work in practice? …it is possible to use the results achieved by charities in the same field as a benchmark. Thus Acumen insists that A to Z’s [a Tanzania-based net manufacturer] bed nets must cost less than the $10 that Malaria No More, a big traditional American charity, says it spends delivering each one it gives away.
Okay, first things first: the $10 mosquito net. It’s true that the net itself does not cost $10—but the $10 price point set by Malaria No More includes the net, transportation, distribution and education costs. Buying the net is just the first step. It needs to get out in the world to do some good, and that means putting it into the hands of families and being sure that people understand how, when and why to use them. Take a look at our nifty pie-chart for a visual representation of where your $10 goes.
Of course, there are variables. Net manufacturers (including A to Z) compete on the free market for the big contracts, so net costs vary. It costs a lot more to deliver a net to Nigeria than it does to Zambia because of infrastructure. There are different import tariffs to take into account. But the $10 price point is an average, and a guarantee that each donation will deliver at least one net to a family in Africa. Luckily, through strategic investments and close partnership with African countries, we’re sometime able to leverage the $10 investment to get more nets over beds.
BUT NOW—onto the more serious charge. I have to take umbrage to the characterization of Malaria No More as “a big traditional American charity”. Goodness, where to start? Let’s dissect this statement…
- Big: Hmm. Including your author, we’re a whopping 15 people. We’ve got a staff of 4 at the DC Policy Center. And thank heavens for our generous army of good-hearted interns, who help more than they’ll ever know! We’re actually quite small—but like to think we make up for it by being so gosh-darn scrappy.
- Traditional: tre-dish-en-el (noun): relating to the past; accepted as historical. But we’re only 2 1/2 years old! Plus, would a traditional charity do this? Or this? Or this? How ’bout this? I think you get my point. Our M.O. is to find new and innovative ways to tackle a global health problem and to add to the global effort (traditional and otherwise) to end deaths as quickly as possible.
- American: I really have to give a nod here to our international affiliates in the United Kingdom, Canada and the Netherlands, who are doing incredible work to raise awareness and support in their own countries. We’re regularly and proudly out-shined by the wonderful work of our global network.
Phew! Long post but there was a lot to cover. Malaria No More is now considering a number of new taglines, from “Malaria No More: A Small, Unique, Global Organization” to “Malaria No More: A Puny, Wacky, Rag-Tag Gang of Hoodlums”.
Let us know which you prefer.